We need to think "fourth dimensionally" - as in a virtual omnipotence

...

jillosophy doesn't necessarily believe the number of the beast (666) is a literal number.

I have for years thought it more logical that there are to be 666 reincarnations of various antichrist's throughout the reign of mankind. And the final antichrist will be the 666th.

This would make sense. And they don't all have to be historical figures or even known in order to change the course of our existence. It could be that just one seemingly inconsequential incident could cause a disruption of our "time-space continum", to quote Dr. Emmett Brown.

Perhaps, for instance, one antichrist was to cause the death of one person who, had they lived, would have posed a very great threat to the powers of evil.

...

DefendUSx

...

Saudi Invents The Mark Of The Beast

by
By Douglas V. Gibbs of

The American Daily Review
Wednesday, March 20, 2009

...
Just When You Thought Big Brother Couldn’t Get Any More Orwellian…Enemy of the State with a twist.

They can track you with satellites, find your doorway with the GPS coordinates shot at your doorway, and now if you try to get away, with the push of a button they can release a lethal poison into your body.

Beware, rightwing extremists, and lovers of the U.S. Constitution, the means to competely control you has arrived.

A Saudi inventor was seeking to bring his insidious killer chip to Germany until the German patent office rejected his request. Germany’s laws prohibit inventions that are unethical or a danger to the public. Considering the sinister history of Hitleric proportions, one can understand that law.

The device in question is a tiny semiconductor that is designed to be surgically implanted or injected into the body. The purpose of the device is to track persons using GPS satellite technology, and in the case of the intention on the patent request, to track visitors who are overstaying their visas.

For some, the creation of such a device is not a surprise considering the increasingly percieved need for security. However, it is not a long shot to consider that the device could be used against citizens for more sinister reasons. How far of a stretch is it for the government to use such devices to keep an eye on “undesireables” and those considered to be subversives? The device could be used to track political opponents, as well as the usual suspects of troublesome people, and eliminate them at will.

Though Germany rejected the inventor’s device, that does not mean the inventor won’t find success in securing a patent for the device in another country.