Wednesday, March 14, 2007

It's the North American Union, stupid... Part 15

PRESIDENT BUSH:
"Buenos días. Estamos encantados de estar en Mexico otra vez.
We're delighted to be in Mexico again... President Calderon, I appreciate your determination to create new opportunities for the people of Mexico. I share your commitment to building an Americas where the poor and the marginalized begin to feel the blessings of liberty in their daily lives. I respect your views on migration. Because we're working together, I believe we will make good progress on this important issue. Together, we're working to ensure that we have a secure and modern border that speeds the legitimate flow of people and commerce, and stop those who threaten our common safety and prosperity....
The United States respects rule of law...
But in the debate on migration, I remind my fellow citizens that family values do not stop at the Rio Grande River, that there are decent, hardworking honorable citizens of Mexico who want to make a living for their families. And so, Mr. President, my pledge to you and your government -- but, more importantly, the people of Mexico -- is I will work as hard as I possibly can to pass comprehensive immigration reform.
Today, the most important ties between the United States and Mexico are not government to government, they are people to people. These ties include churches and faith-based institutions that serve people on both sides of the frontera."
Gee, thanks El Presidente...
for selling out Americans and the country THEY LOVE.
You are one of the worst traitors we have... and we have plenty.
**
CNN Lou Dobbs

President Bush is in Mexico aggressively promoting his plan to give amnesty to as many as 20 million illegal aliens in this country.
Upon his arrival there, President Bush declared he will do everything possible to convince Congress to pass what he calls comprehensive immigration reform legislation. In his first visit to Mexico since Calderon's election, President Bush wants to send a message that the U.S. cares about its neighbors to the south. Bush said: "Mr. President, my pledge to you and your government, but more importantly, the people of Mexico, is I will work as hard as I possibly can to pass comprehensive immigration reform." But in Latin America, bitterness lingers over legislation signed by President Bush and pushed by conservatives in his party to build a 700-mile-long fence along the border. Michael Shifter of Inter-American Dialogue said: "Calderon is interested in an immigration agreement and clearly resents, as do most Mexicans, this idea of building a wall on the border between the United States and Mexico. It sends a message that Latin Americans are an not wanted in the United States, and it's been seen as an insult, and many have taken offense."
[Update: At an event hosted by the American Council for Immigration Reform, we learned from Rep. Duncan Hunter tonight that construction of the border fense has already begun outside Yuma, Arizona, and that 1.5 miles of it is completed at a cost of about $3 million. Hunter said DHS has over $1 billion in its coffers that is earmarked for continued fense construction. He also assured attendees that there is enough support in the House to turn back Sen. Kennedy's amnesty bill. Hunter noted that even Democrats are worried that Kennedy is going too far and that many are reluctant to put their slim majority at risk in 2008 by supporting the final bill.]
**
CNN Lou Dobbs
State lawmakers are asking tough questions about the Security and Prosperity Partnership, what some call the North American Union. It's a plan devised by the Council of Foreign Relations, supported by big business and government elites to integrate the economies of the United States, Mexico, and Canada, with no congressional or voter oversight or approval.
They're working with major companies, harmonizing regulations, they say, and working to move goods and people more safely and quickly across borders. Arizona state senator Karen Johnson (R) is convinced it's nothing short of a move toward a European-style North American union. She doesn't buy the government position that the SPP is an effort to make all three countries more efficient and safe. She said: "How can you harmonize and merge laws together with a narco-state? I mean, that is what Mexico is. It's an oligarchy. It has nothing to do with the way we govern. And Canada, as nice a country as it is, is socialistic." Hers is one of more than a dozen states where lawmakers are considering legislation or passing resolutions opposing the SPP.
MORE INFORMATION:

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm beginning to wonder if our Government, including its "shadow" government, is being "blackmailed" into forming the NAU, with wars, debt, illegal immigration, shadow rulers, etc., being necessitated by threats of overwhelming and devastating personal/familial/national harm the result of non-compliance. Who might the blackmailers be? Drug Cartels, money/trade/crime-rings, Communist China, the Middle East, the EU, the CFR, Latin America, major financial institutions, the "military-industrial" complex, the man in the moon, the essential "Big Brother," and/or you name it? Why else would so much increasing chaos and confusion go unchecked and unexplained in this country, and be even encouraged by those supposedly in charge. Why else would our visible Government want the USA to sink into relative oblivion, save to protect and preserve their own interests from figures threatening darkness directly to them. Our President supposedly now owns much (water-rich) land in Paraguay. Cheney's Halliburton is moving its headquarters to the Middle East. It must be nice to have a good safety hatch, should one become necessary. We may think the long-planned-for NAU is a bad, even a disastrous, idea; but Stupid Me, I worry about the forces behind the forces that are behind the visible forces triggering its realization. Go figure.

3:17 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home