It's Intentional.

"President Obama has now demonstrated to the world’s investors that rules and laws don’t matter - - his personal and political preferences are what matter, and he will get his way, even if investors are denied their rights and damaged in the process."

...

I have been saying all along that he wants to destroy this country and build it back up again according to his own institutional specifications.

See this post from over a year ago: http://jillosophy.blogspot.com/search?q=astrological: "What I see here is that he will be able to wear the generous mask of Jupiter in dealing with relationships, society and the people around him, while he is actually doing the work of Saturn - which is not good. Saturn is brutal, restrictive, remorseless, a very stern father - a slave driver.

I see here someone who is dangerous with power over others....
What I see here is someone who can become a dictator of the people that would trust him.

I see here someone who can see his place in the real world (Second House) is to fight (Mars), destroy and then rebuild (Pluto) the world he sees around him to his own institutionalized specifications(Saturn)."

And all that is proving to be true.

He may make us so weak that we cannot resist other countries' beligerent influences. Perhaps Iran & Venezuela. Perhaps they will get their bomb (this year, I predict) and then it's extortion-time. Obama will say, "Listen, America, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. Just leave everything to me." Then he will be their partner, and we will be ruled as they rule their citizens. He will not govern - he will rule. This is what he wants.

He can also destroy this country to the point where there is nothing left to fight for, to where it is beyond recognizable. It will be out of our control, we will be a country divided. He will flood this country with foreigners who will vote his way - if we're allowed to vote anymore at all.

Or it may be all of the above.

...

Read it all:

Obamanomics: Naive, Or Intentionally Destructive?

townhall.com

by Austin Hill
Does President Obama want the U.S. economy to decline further? Or is he just simply naïve about what is required to make the economy grow, and about the differences between “good“ and “bad“ economic policy?
I’ve pondered these questions several times since January 20th, not only in the column I write here for this publication, but on talk radio, and in columns published elsewhere.
And in light of the President’s behavior within the past ten days, the questions are worth reviewing again.