I Muse, Therefore I Am... a very dangerous person?
...I had a short email conversation with another blogger after watching THIS important video. I took a few days to think things over and to watch the video again.
These are some of my thoughts that I shared with him:
...
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:17 PM
Subject: I have been thinking...
...
I am just beginning to learn about Bilderberg - and the thought that comes to my mind after looking over the attendee list is this:
I posted it here on my blog: IF YOU BILDERBERG IT, THEY WILL COME
Subject: I have been thinking...
...
I am just beginning to learn about Bilderberg - and the thought that comes to my mind after looking over the attendee list is this:
I posted it here on my blog: IF YOU BILDERBERG IT, THEY WILL COME
The one thing I noticed that gave me relief is that the closest thing to islam represented there are two or three names from Turkey. I think that what will happen is that there are these two diametrically opposed forces bidding for complete global control and utter dominance.
One is secular (Bilderberg) and one is religeous & fanatical (islam). One is forward-thinking, one is backward in all it is and does. One wants to control the future, and one wants to obliterate the future (literally).
Bilderberg will have to devise a way to defeat or control islam before it can contain & control the world. Islamic fanatics will ruin all of their hopes & dreams. Bilderberg's methods are to create and control chaos... if I understand it correctly.
Hopefully it will not invite any muslim leaders into its fold in order to accomplish this - even temporarily. Although that's what I would consider if I were them... but I bet that they have and have concluded that you could never trust muslims. They would/will do to Bilderberg just what they do to everyone, everything else they touch: DESTROY.
Hopefully it will not invite any muslim leaders into its fold in order to accomplish this - even temporarily. Although that's what I would consider if I were them... but I bet that they have and have concluded that you could never trust muslims. They would/will do to Bilderberg just what they do to everyone, everything else they touch: DESTROY.
I am sure Bilderberg is well aware of this - the fact that islam is just as much a threat to them as they are to everyone else.I still am perplexed as to why they seem to be allowing the islamization of Europe, however... unless they think that islam is a chaos they can control. (Good luck with that).We may end up with a choice of the lesser of two evils: islam or Bilderberg.
I also noticed no Chinese, Asians, Hispanic/Latin or Russians. Am I right? Or did I miss something? All but a few of those names are completely new to me. I don't know anything about them at all - not their backstories or connections. My musings are purely from the names I read. Nothing more.
I am thinking, mulling, reflecting - and trying to learn fast.
My next thought is: since I can't figure out a logical reason for NWO to allow the violent, blatant, beligerent islamization of their own countries, I have to figure that if they are not betting on being able to manipulate this situation then they must be getting desperate. Panicked.
And this does make sense to me, given the foreboding in my gut when I attempt to contemplate the future. Desperate times call for desperate measures, as they say. And who knows what they will do if their backs are really up against a wall.
I think perhaps they thought that they could somehow manipulate this situation, and took the fear and panick of the people as an in towards controlling us. As long as "extreme" homeland security was is indeed necessary, they would run with it, rather than really take to it in earnest and actually do something to seriously hobble islamic agression. We could have done something that would have made a credible difference. We could have squashed it quickly and easily, as all it would take was some SERIOUS…
And this does make sense to me, given the foreboding in my gut when I attempt to contemplate the future. Desperate times call for desperate measures, as they say. And who knows what they will do if their backs are really up against a wall.
I think perhaps they thought that they could somehow manipulate this situation, and took the fear and panick of the people as an in towards controlling us. As long as "extreme" homeland security was is indeed necessary, they would run with it, rather than really take to it in earnest and actually do something to seriously hobble islamic agression. We could have done something that would have made a credible difference. We could have squashed it quickly and easily, as all it would take was something SERIOUS.
We could have actually squashed islamic aggression by showing them that we were serious. All that would have taken was some real, honest brutality - which is the only thing they understand and respect - and probably what they feared most and expected. It would have worked like a charm... think Hiroshima. I have no problem with that whatsoever. This would all be past us if we had.
But "we" didn't. I think that the powers that be took their eye off the ball and decided to milk it for all they could instead. Let the American military take care of it... but just to a certain extent. 'We have to keep them in control too. They will win when we're ready to let them win.'
Now I think they find that rather than fighting back like we meant it, that they miscalculated. Thought they could get more out of it than they did. And now they've created a monster. Now what do they do? Now what will they do?
This scenario seems logical to me at this point. It answers the questions: why are they letting this islamization happen? Why did they let this happen at all since it could easily have been stopped? What did they think they could get out of it? How desperate are they now that their backs are against the wall? Were they trying to "deal" with the Saudi's prior to 9/11, under the promise that the (lying) Saudi muslims (practially westernized now because who can resist our charm and perks offered) would handle the muslims?
Too many thoughts. But it feels right, this conclusion.
I also noticed no Chinese, Asians, Hispanic/Latin or Russians. Am I right? Or did I miss something? All but a few of those names are completely new to me. I don't know anything about them at all - not their backstories or connections. My musings are purely from the names I read. Nothing more.
I am thinking, mulling, reflecting - and trying to learn fast.
My next thought is: since I can't figure out a logical reason for NWO to allow the violent, blatant, beligerent islamization of their own countries, I have to figure that if they are not betting on being able to manipulate this situation then they must be getting desperate. Panicked.
And this does make sense to me, given the foreboding in my gut when I attempt to contemplate the future. Desperate times call for desperate measures, as they say. And who knows what they will do if their backs are really up against a wall.
I think perhaps they thought that they could somehow manipulate this situation, and took the fear and panick of the people as an in towards controlling us. As long as "extreme" homeland security was is indeed necessary, they would run with it, rather than really take to it in earnest and actually do something to seriously hobble islamic agression. We could have done something that would have made a credible difference. We could have squashed it quickly and easily, as all it would take was some SERIOUS…
And this does make sense to me, given the foreboding in my gut when I attempt to contemplate the future. Desperate times call for desperate measures, as they say. And who knows what they will do if their backs are really up against a wall.
I think perhaps they thought that they could somehow manipulate this situation, and took the fear and panick of the people as an in towards controlling us. As long as "extreme" homeland security was is indeed necessary, they would run with it, rather than really take to it in earnest and actually do something to seriously hobble islamic agression. We could have done something that would have made a credible difference. We could have squashed it quickly and easily, as all it would take was something SERIOUS.
We could have actually squashed islamic aggression by showing them that we were serious. All that would have taken was some real, honest brutality - which is the only thing they understand and respect - and probably what they feared most and expected. It would have worked like a charm... think Hiroshima. I have no problem with that whatsoever. This would all be past us if we had.
But "we" didn't. I think that the powers that be took their eye off the ball and decided to milk it for all they could instead. Let the American military take care of it... but just to a certain extent. 'We have to keep them in control too. They will win when we're ready to let them win.'
Now I think they find that rather than fighting back like we meant it, that they miscalculated. Thought they could get more out of it than they did. And now they've created a monster. Now what do they do? Now what will they do?
This scenario seems logical to me at this point. It answers the questions: why are they letting this islamization happen? Why did they let this happen at all since it could easily have been stopped? What did they think they could get out of it? How desperate are they now that their backs are against the wall? Were they trying to "deal" with the Saudi's prior to 9/11, under the promise that the (lying) Saudi muslims (practially westernized now because who can resist our charm and perks offered) would handle the muslims?
Too many thoughts. But it feels right, this conclusion.
posted by jillosophy at 5/21/2009 12:45:00 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home