Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Federal bill would rob poor, benefit corporations

During recent testimony before Congress, Willard T. Fair (President of the Urban League of Greater Miami) asked real-life questions striking at the heart of the proposed amnesty:
"Think about it this way: If there's a young black man in Liberty City, where I live, who's good with his hands and wants to become a carpenter, which is more likely to help him achieve that goal — amnesty and more immigration, or enforcement and less immigration?
"Which is more likely to help an ex-convict or recovering addict get hired at an entry-level job and start the climb back to a decent life — amnesty and more immigration, or enforcement and less immigration?
"Which is more likely to persuade a teenager in the inner city to reject the lure of gang life and instead stick with honest employment — amnesty and more immigration, or enforcement and less immigration?"
**
State Sen. Chip Rogers -- Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Assume Congress was considering a "comprehensive" plan to reduce wages for the poor, increase crime in minority neighborhoods, further diminish already failing pubic schools, and seriously strain an overburdened health care system. -- Surely such a proposal would be dismissed as "un- American."
Yet this is exactly what the current amnesty/guest worker bill would accomplish.
While multinational corporations brazenly urge Congress to decriminalize the subsidized illegal labor of an estimated 20 million illegal aliens, there has been little public exposure of what would happen to low-income U.S. citizens, particularly minorities...

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home