Wednesday, November 29, 2006

ELLISON TO TAKE OATH WITH THE KORAN, NOT THE BIBLE

;) to a good patriot who goes by the name: UnAmericanYOU
**
DON'T LET DHIMMITUDE HAPPEN TO YOU!
FRIENDS DON'T LET FRIENDS DO THE DHIMMI THING! - jillosophy
**
Dhimmesota didn't knwo what they were getting into when they elected this guy! Call me an Islamophobe, please. Part 3
**
America, Not Keith Ellison, decides what book a congressman takes his oath on
townhall.com
By Dennis PragerTuesday, November 28, 2006
**
Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the first Muslim elected to the United States Congress, has announced that he will not take his oath of office on the Bible, but on the bible of Islam, the Koran.
He should not be allowed to do so -- not because of any American hostility to the Koran, but because the act undermines American
civilization.

First, it is an act of hubris that perfectly exemplifies multiculturalist activism -- my culture trumps America's culture. What Ellison and his Muslim and leftist supporters are saying is that it is of no consequence what America holds as its holiest book; all that matters is what any individual holds to be his holiest book.
Forgive me, but America should not give a hoot what Keith Ellison's favorite book is. Insofar as a member of Congress taking an oath to serve America and uphold its values is concerned, America is interested in only one book, the Bible. If you are incapable of taking an oath on that book, don't serve in Congress. In your personal life, we will fight for your right to prefer any other book. We will even fight for your right to publish cartoons mocking our Bible. But, Mr. Ellison, America, not you, decides on what book its public servants take their oath.
**
Devotees of multiculturalism and political correctness who do not see how damaging to the fabric of American civilization it is to allow Ellison to choose his own book need only imagine a racist elected to Congress. Would they allow him to choose Hitler's "Mein Kampf," the Nazis' bible, for his oath? And if not, why not? On what grounds will those defending Ellison's right to choose his favorite book deny that same right to a racist who is elected to public office?
**
... America will not change the attitude of a single American-hating Muslim by allowing Ellison to substitute the Koran for the Bible. In fact, the opposite is more likely: Ellison's doing so will embolden Islamic extremists and make new ones, as Islamists, rightly or wrongly, see the first sign of the realization of their greatest goal -- the Islamicization of America.
**
(read on, brave readers...)

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I knew it was going to happen that he would get his way with that cult book. This is very dangerous.

11:21 PM  
Blogger Joe said...

I agree that civil magistrates should not take oaths to the Koran, but the issue is not that Jews, Muslims etc. should take an oath to a book they do not believe but rather that they do not meet the biblical qualifications for civil magistrates.

5:46 AM  
Anonymous anonYmouse said...

Witness the slippery slope of "legal pluralism" otherwise known as a civilizational suicide pact -

"Parallel" Sharia legal system on the rise in UK
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/11/29/nsharia29.xml

[ , , ]
=\o/=

8:41 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home